No
Foldem Holdem - Some Simple Facts Of
Low Limit Poker, And How To Adjust
Your Strategy Accordingly
By:
Rune Hansen
I
just stumbled across an old post of mine
at the forum, which after rereading it,
turned out to be a true gem. So apart
from adding a few things I felt like including
after reading it, here's one from the
archives.
A
lot of the posts on the forum concern
bad beats. And when you play low limit
holdem you're bound to experience a lot
of them. Nevertheless it is not because
of the bad beats you lose in the long
run. While bad beats cause you to lose
big pots, you usually couldn't (and shouldn't)
have played these hands any different.
The real problems are the small drops.
The extra call you shouldn't make, the
lame bluff you tried to pull in the wrong
spot, the extra money you could have won
by betting your strong hands etc. Bad
beats directs your attention towards the
wrong issues.
Playing
at a no foldem table requires quite a
different set of tools compared to playing
a tight aggressive table. And poker is
not about playing like the books say.
It's about winning money. And applying
the book lessons in situations where they
don't apply is a sure loser. What you're
striving to achieve is something an old
guitarist who I used to know once said
about his music "You need to know all
the skills of the trade, and then you
need to be able to forget all about it
while you play". In poker this translates
to knowing all the books, and be able
to use each bit in them whenever a favorable
situation for that particular move arises.
Some people find no foldem holdem really
hard to beat and prefer tighter games.
To them I can only say that if they get
good results they should probably stay
with that table selection. Cause then
they've probably found a table that is
favorable to their particular style of
play. The only problem is, that unless
it's an all-regular game, the normal table
conditions can change very fast when a
few lose players enter the game. So no
matter how you look at it, being able
to play no foldem only makes your game
stronger at higher limits. And in my experience
poker is not necessarily easier at higher
limits. It's just different. You need
all the low limit skills plus a few extras.
So
what strategy changes do you need to play
a loose passive (no foldem game)?
Poker
is a game of knowledge. Now what knowledge
do we have of our opponents in a no-foldem
game? We sure know this:
Fact
A.
Most players will play any two cards,
or at least any two suited cards. They
will call to showdown with any pair, any
straight draw and flush draw and sometimes
just a random hand that is in no way connected
to the flop.
Consequence:
We're bound to get outdrawn quite a lot.
AA will probably hold up less then half
of the times. And the better player will
be drawn out a lot more then the poor
player will, simply because the good player
doesn't proceed from the flop, unless
ahead, or close behind. But when we lose
a pot we only lose 20-25% of the pot size.
When we win we take down it all. So we
only have to win 1 in 5 to break even.
In other words - Don't be a whiner. If
you want the gold at the end of the rainbow,
the price is some horrible outdraws in
between.
Fact
B.
These players seldom bet with less the
top pair, and seldom raise after the flop
with less then 2 pair.
Consequence:
Be prepared to fold that top pair decent
kicker for a raise.
Fact C. You
will have 50% players in average seeing
the flop.
Consequence:
You know in advance that you will have
pot odds for flush draws, open ended straight
draws and gutshot draws with overcards.
Basically, if you're strong (read - good
at folding a lot) after the flop, you
can play a lot of hands like 109s, 98s,
87s and even 76s from late position. In
order to fully utilize the fact that you
know that you get good pot odds, and have
a lot of dead money in the pots, you'll
have to take quite a few flops. Seeing
a flop is pretty cheap compared to the
average pot size. What's expensive is
if you take too many hands beyond the
flop.
Conventional
wisdom is that you have to play tight
in a loose game. I don't necessarily agree.
You can play somewhat loose pre-flop,
provided that you play super tight after
the flop.
Fact
D.
Some idea of how often the pot is raised
pre-flop.
Consequence:
Some of these games are very passive pre-flop,
which means that you can play more hands
from earlier positions. If it's start
raised more then 50% of the time, you
have to play super tight from early and
mid positions. In loose passive games
that are also passive pre-flop I will
play most of the suited connectors (also
the lower ones) from mid position as well.
Fact
E.
No pot is ever won without a showdown.
Consequence:
Bluffs don't work. In any case you should
not try to play more the two players in
any game setting. Also bear in mind, that
you'd like to preserve your bluffing to
situations where you have a chance to
make a big win, i.e. on the river where
a really scary river card lands, you're
heads up or 3-way, and you know that they
perceive you as a really tight non-bluffing
player.
©
The Poker Forum.com, all rights reserved
|