Bankroll
Management
By:
Rune Hansen (Z)
How
do you maintain a bankroll that allows
you to move up limits? Well, if you are
a winning player and don't spend your
winnings you will build your bankroll.
It really is that simple. There are two
ways to spend your bankroll. You can cash
out and spend the money, or you can lose
it. In my opinion a good bank roll management
strategy is one that takes care of both
these issues. As a newbie player your
first objective should be to establish
and maintain a bankroll at a low limit.
As soon as you have established yourself
as a winning player at that limit, your
bankroll will grow. Beware that you can
win for quite long periods due to luck,
even though your skills are not developed
to a degree where you have a positive
long-term expectation. Also don't blame
luck for your setbacks. You are in it
for the long term, and the outcome of
individual large pots will have huge impact
on your bank roll in the short run. Yet,
it is usually that one call you should
have saved or the value bet you failed
to make, that makes up the difference
in the long run. So in order to get a
reliable picture of your performance,
it is strongly recommended that you keep
accurate records, stating as a minimum
the limit played, start time and finish
time and + or - results for every session
you play. You need this data in order
to perform a reliable self-assessment.
Bankroll
management is one of the most important
issues facing any poker player. As a matter
of fact I believe that unless your bankroll
management skills are reasonably sound,
the rest of your skill set will not help
you much unless you are truly gifted.
Yet, I keep seeing people posting the
wrong questions on the forum regarding
bankroll management, and therefore misinterpreting
the answers they get. Specifically, the
"Theory of Bank Roll Management (TBRM)"
discussed by Angel Largay in
his articles on this site,
and thoroughly discussed in Mason Malmuth's
classic "Gambling Theory and Other Topics"
seems to give wide scope for misunderstandings.
The
TBRM is a statistical analysis of what
type of swings one should expect. In other
words, how much should you expect luck
to influence you before the long-term
skill factor kicks in? This is dependent
on a lot of variables, but as a rule of
thumb a winning player should be able
to withstand most swings with a bankroll
of 300 big bets.
My
main argument with the TBRM is that I
think it is not really relevant to answering
the most important questions relating
to bankroll management. For instance,
it assumes that you are winning player,
and that you have access to good and reliable
data on your hourly rate and standard
deviation. In my experience this is simply
not the case for the inexperienced player.
Sometimes it's not even the case for the
experienced player. Furthermore the 300
big bet rule offers no guarantees. My
personal record daily swing is 207 big
bets in one day! The TBRM is important
in the sense that knowing what luck has
in store for you will help you in tackling
it mentally. But as a bankroll management
tool I much prefer a simple approach that
will make sure that you ask yourself the
unpleasant questions.
The
first thing you need to do is to decide
what role poker should play in your life.
Even though everyone seems to think that
the sole purpose of poker is to make money
and quit your job, I personally still
believe that poker should first and foremost
be played for fun. And in order to have
fun, you should play at a level where
the wins and losses bite, as this will
make you try your hardest. But at the
same time, it should be done within a
budget that doesn't interfere with other
priorities in your life. In short - I
think it is extremely important that you
allocate a monthly
poker budget and stick to it. Keep
your poker bankroll in a cookie jar and
keep it separate from your personal economy.
And leave your credit cards at home when
you go to the casino. The thing is that
when you lose you want to fight the humiliation
right away. You are not capable of playing
good poker in this upset frame of mind,
neither are you able to make sound financial
dispositions. The hardest call in poker
is to know when it's time to quit. You
might as well start practicing this right
away, as you will have to make this call
numerous times during your education as
a poker player. If you fail to make it
in time, you will get crushed. It's just
a matter of time.
The
next thing you need to do, is to apply
a stop loss on every poker session
you play. Mason Malmuth and Angel Largay
both argue that if the game is good, a
streak of bad luck early on should not
scare you from keep playing. I strongly
disagree.
First
of all, the reason you might loose may
seem to be bad luck to you, simply because
you don't understand the superior playing
style of your opponents. Table selection
is something that you learn with experience,
and even with a lot of experience, you
still should expect to get it wrong every
now and then. To an inexperienced player
a super aggressive table might look like
a good game, because you will see a lot
of ugly showdowns. In reality this game
might be a very tough game to beat.
Secondly,
losing involves a lot of emotional stress.
Instead of tilting, you should go for
a walk to let the steam out before you
re-engage in combat.
Thirdly, getting stuck often leads to
money blindness. When you are seriously
stuck most people tend to take bigger
risks in order to get back even. They
get the feeling that they cannot lose
more then they have already, as the pain
threshold stops at seriously stuck. There
is no such thing as more then seriously
stuck. So make sure to take home your
losses while you still can, without having
to leave your entire personal budget in
the hands of Lady Luck.
Fourth,
I recently experienced in Las Vegas how
a bad run of cards can ruin your table
image. Your opponents start to smell blood.
When I see another player get hurt, I
know that he will play weaker then normal.
Therefore I will bluff him more frequently,
and generally play tougher against him
than against a strong opponent. So even
though the game is generally good, and
my game is still my A-game, a bad run
of cards early in the session can turn
a good game into a good game that is just
no good for me, because everybody starts
to play better against me.
Finally,
you learn much more when you lose than
when you win. When you win you feel invincible,
and are busy congratulating yourself.
But when you lose you try to find reasons.
Make sure that you learn from the poker
lessons you involuntarily pay for. Taking
a break after a losing session replaying
every hand in your mind, evaluating if
you could have played it differently is
the way we learn. And while you're at
it - write down your thoughts and conclusions.
Because chances are that you will face
the same problems many times, before you
finally manage to overcome the problem
altogether.
When
you have established yourself as a winning
grinder at a certain limit, you should
start to develop a hunger for the limit
just above your current limit. Often you
hear players complain that low limit games
are unbeatable, and the solution to a
low limit loss is to move up limit. In
my experience this is rubbish. In general,
the higher the limit the tougher the opposition.
The successful players at the higher limits
probably have paid their dues at lower
limits too. You should therefore take
on the limits one at a time. Furthermore,
you should not expect to win at the higher
limit at your first attempt. In my experience,
it take several attempts to move up, as
you will need to learn new things, and
you will need to adapt to the different
playing style of your opponents. Finally,
there is no guarantee that you have what
it takes to compete at this tougher limit.
Yet, if you are competitive by nature,
there is no excuse for not trying to move
up when you have secured your bankroll
at a given limit.
So
when you attempt to move up you must decide
in advance how much you will pay to learn
at this new higher limit, and after
you lose it you should go
back to your bread and butter limit grinding
back the loss before you attempt again.
You should never jeopardize your bankroll
by letting it fall below 300 big bets
for the limit you play. If it does (and
you should expect long losing periods
every now and then - month long losing
streaks are not unusual), you
should move down limit until your bankroll
is at 300 big bets for the limit you play.
Don't let pride stop you from doing this.
Some times your mind will be elsewhere
causing you to play badly. This is ok
- you're only human. But don't take it
out on your bankroll. Also reading books
and increasing your poker knowledge tend
to destroy my game for awhile, while my
old game falls to pieces and I am yet
not fully confident in when and how to
apply my new knowledge. Losing is normal.
If you manage to beat one limit and comply
with these rules, you should be able to
enjoy your poker hobby for free. You should
also be able to work your way up limits
without jeopardizing your bankroll in
the process. As the 300 big bets is a
value that increase quite a bit in dollars
when you move up limit, you will have
to decide how much you will invest in
your poker education, through keeping
the money in your bankroll, and how much
of your winnings you want to spend (at
the expense of a slower learning curve
and move up limits).
By
now you should be able to see why bankroll
management is something that should always
be on the forefront of your mind, no matter
what limit you play. In the food chain
of poker there is a constant stream of
money up limits. The winning $1-2 lose
some of his profits at $2-4, the winning
$2-4 lose some of his profits at $5-10
and so forth. Within the last couple of
years I have worked my way up from the
$0.5-1 to the $30-60 tables with my initial
investment of 100 bucks. I am currently
trying to break through to the next level
of $100-200. The master's classes at $100-200
are pretty damned expensive. And despite
a solid bankroll, I could lose it all
there if I didn't know when to back off.
But to me, there is no difference between
playing $30-60 trying to break $100-200
and playing $0.5-1 trying to break $1-2.
The tools you need to manage your bankroll
are the same.
Acknowledgment:
Thanks to Leigh Lightfoot for taking the
time to proof reading my articles.
©
The Poker Forum.com, all rights reserved
|