Money
Management for Online Players
By:
Joe Benik
Oh,
good. Another article on the riveting
subject of money management! What could
be more mind-numbingly boring than this?
I'll admit, I found articles on the subject
boring once too. Then I went through four
figures of bankroll in a short period
of time, and had to make a deposit into
my online account for the first time in
years. This is money that my family had
budgeting to do other things with, and
I am using it to feed my online poker
urges.
Sound
familiar? Well, if you've managed to avoid
this depressing place in your poker life,
I congratulate you. But most of us have
not, and so most of us can benefit from
a couple of rules surrounding money management.
If, like me, you never want to have to
make another deposit, read on.
If
you play most of your poker online, you
need to think differently about money
management than players in either home
games and brick and mortar card rooms.
The online game is a simply a different
animal than in those other environments.
There are two reasons for this.
1.
The online game moves much faster. Without
the need to shuffle the deck between hands,
or sell chips to players, or wait for
players to act, online card rooms have
the ability to deal anywhere from three
to five times the numbers of hands to
you per hour than live dealers. This means
that the blinds come around three to five
times as quickly, and your chips are at
risk three to five times as often. All
of this creates greater fluctuations of
your bankroll than for live games.
Those
of you with some education in Mathematics
might be asking, "but wouldn't the large
numbers of hands actually reduce the variance,
rather than increase it? After all, isn't
there less variance in large numbers than
small numbers?" You'd think so, but you'd
be wrong.
The
increased hand count will stabilize the
overall cards that you receive in a given
amount of time. But the short-term variance
still exists; it's just squeezed into
a smaller time frame. And Mathematics
does not control those times when you're
just not playing well. In a rapid-fire
online session, when you're not at the
top of your game, you stand to lose much
more than when you're playing live.
2.
The second reason why online games require
different money management skills is that
most players don't play their best poker
online. We tend to try more bluffs, call
more bets with marginal hands, and chase
more draws with thin odds when we're online
than when we are sitting with live players.
I don't know the reason; it's probably
different for everybody. Maybe it is out
of boredom, maybe it is because we are
usually doing other things when playing
online, maybe because betting and calling
requires clicking our mouse, rather than
throwing in chips. Maybe it is because
we don't think that online players are
as good as live players (even though we
suspect that they are the exact same people).
For whatever reasons, people tend to play
a great deal more loosely online than
in live games.
Again,
if you've managed to avoid this trap,
more power to you. But most of us haven't,
and so we've got to watch our bankroll
more closely. Here are two ways to do
so.
1.
Make a promise to yourself that you will
always follow the Ten Percent Rule. Promise
yourself that you will not lose more than
10% of your bankroll in the same day.
And when you sit down to a game, don't
buy in for more chips than represents
10% of you total bankroll. If you make
money, great. In the next session, your
bankroll will be slightly larger, and
you can buy in for more. If you keep winning,
then you will be able to risk more, and
keep winning by higher and higher amounts.
But
if you are losing, either from sheer bad
luck or from playing less than your best
game, you won't be crippled in a single
session. The worst thing that can possibly
happen if you follow the Ten Percent Rule
is that you'll have a short, losing session,
and have to put poker aside until the
next day. And when you're losing, isn't
that the best thing to do anyway?
2.
So if you're only going to risk 10% of
your bank in a single session, what games
can you play in? Well, you'll probably
start a great deal lower than you're used
to. If you have $1000 in the bank, you
might be playing $5-$10 or $10-$20 limit,
or maybe a $300 No Limit game, or a $200
tournament. Not anymore. If your bankroll
is $1000, then you have $100 to play with,
which means that you are playing $2-$4
or $3-$6, or buying into a $100 cash game
or tournament. Think in terms of how much
you can risk today, not how much you have
total. And only play at the level your
bankroll can realistically afford.
The
advantage of this is that you should never
run out of bankroll. If you keep losing,
you will simply play for smaller and small
stakes until you find a game that you
can beat. Then, you can start winning
again, and earn enough to get back to
the levels at which you belong.
I know, I know. It isn't a lot of fun
playing against $2-$4 players when you've
been playing in $10-$20 games. But be
honest. If you only had $1000 in your
account, should you really be sitting
at a $10-$20 table, where half of your
bankroll is at risk in a single session?
At $10-$20, it will usually take you about
$80-$100 to see a hand to the river, which
means that it only takes four or five
losing showdowns to lose $400. Think about
that. Four or five bad beats, four or
five times when you are outkicked, or
your trips lose to bigger set. Is such
a thing possible? You bet. And when you're
playing online, it is not only possible,
but it can happen three to five times
faster.
Money
management is boring stuff. But it's good
poker. Even for the best players, poker
is a risky endeavor, and you have to protect
your downside at all times. By holding
back 90% of your bankroll, and only playing
in games where you can buy in with the
remaining 10%, you will be doing that.
And when you accumulate enough to get
back to the $10-$20 games, you'll play
them even better because you'll be motivated
to stay there.
©
The Poker Forum.com, all rights reserved
|