SURVIVING
IN TOURNAMENTS
BY:
Gary Stephen Jr.
A
common lament in the Tournament Strategy
forum is, "When I don't get the hands
I just seem to die by blinds in whatever
tourney I play." This was true of me too,
until I realized that stealing pots is
crucial to one's success in tournament
play.
I stopped being "anted to death" when
I learned how to steal pots. This not
only keeps the blinds from eating you
alive, but builds you a healthy stack
that makes it easier to steal even more
pots later on.
Here
are some of the factors I've learned to
consider when deciding whether or not
to steal a pot. In no particular order:
1.
Opponents' stack sizes. In other words,
who to steal from based on how many chips
they have. A very small stack may call
you out of desperation. A very large stack
may call you because it doesn't cost him
very much to do so.
My ideal bluff situation is to make a
pot-sized bet that's about 15-20% of my
opponent's stack. More than that, and
he might move in; less than that and it's
a cheap call.
The
book Pot-Limit and No-Limit Poker by Bob
Ciaffone and Stewart Reuben makes a great
point. In no-limit play, a bet achieves
an influence out of proportion to its
size. Let's say it's heads-up on the flop,
the pot size is 1500, and my opponent
has 10000 chips. If I bet 1500, I'm essentially
threatening his whole stack. If he calls
and doesn't improve, he's facing another
pot-sized bet on the turn for half his
stack, and then the rest of it on the
river. Use this to your advantage.
This
stems, of course, from a general knowledge
of stack-size dynamics in tournament play.
David Sklansky's book on tournament poker
has an excellent discussion of this.
2. Understand that chips change value.
Mason Malmuth first advanced the idea
that in a tournament, the more chips you
have, the less each chip is worth. If
I have 1000 chips and lose 1000, it hurts
me a lot more than if I have 50000 chips
and lose 1000.
So
if you have a big stack, it doesn't hurt
you as much to play a hand and lose. You
can use this to your advantage.
Say
you have 25000 chips, and you're against
two opponents who each have 9000. A pot-sized
bet of 2000 is a minimal risk for you;
if you lose, you still have 23000. But
losing 2000 chips will do a lot of damage
to one of the smaller stacks.
And,
as above, anyone who calls such a bet
faces being set-in on the turn. Between
this item and the previous one, you can
actually threaten someone else's entire
stack with less than ten percent of your
stack. That's "using your chips."
A
great example of this is the first-season
WPT event that had Cal Dykes. He got crap
cards all night, and did nothing but move-in
pre-flop with his medium-sized stack.
But if you watch closely, he only did
this when it would have been very expensive
for anyone behind him to call. He didn't
do this when Ron Rose, who had a gigantic
stack, was behind him, since Ron is likely
to call. Sometimes Cal had a hand when
he moved in pre-flop; most of the time
he didn't. But he still turned a sixth-place
payoff into a second-place one, and might
have done better had Rose not outdrawn
him on the first heads-up hand.
3.
The Gap Concept, and how to use it. The
Gap Concept is explained David Sklansky's
book, Tournament Poker For Advanced Players.
The "gap" refers to the difference between
which hands you can raise with, and which
hands you can call with. In general you
need a stronger hand to call than you
do to raise.
At
certain moments of a tournament, the Gap
can be huge, resulting in situations where
you can win a lot of blinds just by raising
first-in preflop. Best time: the middle
stages. Even better if you're at a short-handed
table. This ties into our next topic:
4.
Stage of the tournament. You're not going
to steal very much early. Most people
will call you, because the antes are low
relative to stack size, and because the
field is still populated with weak players
who have no clue they shouldn't be calling.
In fact, early on, your strategy should
be the opposite; take a lot of flops for
cheap vs. multiple opponents.
In other words, the Gap varies a great
deal at different stages of the tournament.
At the first stake level, it's pretty
much non-existent. Around the third or
fourth stake level, the Gap begins to
widen; people are less likely to call
a raise because the amount of a normal-sized
raise threatens their whole stack. When
you get close to the money, the Gap can
become gigantic, as most of your opponents
will be playing super-tight trying to
squeak into 50th place.
Yes,
survival tactics are important at times.
It's wise not to risk ruin with a healthy
stack if you're one out of the money and
there are two tiny stacks. But most people
apply this thinking way too much, and
way too early. This is exactly the time
when you should be trying to steal. Take
advantage of the tightness of others.
5.
Free yourself from the limit hold'em approach.
I frequently see tournament players raise,
call, and fold with the exact hands they
would in a limit cash game. Even in a
limit tournament, you would want to change
things a bit from a limit cash game. Certainly
so in a no limit tournament.
Not
only does this make you easy to read,
but you miss out on steal opportunities
if you limit yourself to only raising
with the "raising hands" from the Lee
Jones playbook. (The Lee Jones playbook
is fine for low-limit ring game play;
this is tournament play.) And as point
#16 below will explain, profitable steal
situations are dictated by factors such
as who you're up against and how big their
stack is. The cards you hold are secondary,
if not irrelevant.
6.
Don't put the screws to yourself. Bad
bluffers actually hurt themselves a couple
different ways.
A
common mistake is to attempt a "bluff"
with a fair hand, one that might actually
be good enough to win. Let's say you have
pocket sixes heads-up and J-8-2 flops.
The
problem is that if you bet this hand and
get raised, you're the one facing the
tough decision. Your sixes might be good,
as the opponent could easily be bluffing,
betting a draw, or betting a lesser hand
like pocket fives. But it's going to cost
you a fortune to find out. And what do
you do if you call and don't improve on
the turn?
I
don't like to bluff when I've got a little
something, as in the above example. If
it's checked to me, I might check behind
him and take another card. I might spike
a harmless-looking six on the turn, or
induce a bluff I can call fairly inexpensively
(since the pot is kept small).
I
much prefer to bluff with complete garbage.
If J-8-2 flops I'll fire away with K5.
If I get raised, I'm not facing a difficult
decision. I get away at a minimal loss,
and no psychological torture.
Sklansky
puts it this way: "Don't raise if you
don't want to be reraised." Of course
you don't mind being reraised if you've
got a monster. But you also don't mind
being raised if your hand is so bad you
can throw it away with no qualms. What
gets you in trouble are those in-between
situations. You want to force your opponents,
not yourself, to make those tough decisions.
7.
Don't make sissy bets. This is another
thing bad bluffers do; they make respectable-size
bets when they've got a hand, and puny
bets when they're bluffing. This makes
them easy to read.
Furthermore,
when you make a tiny bet you're giving
up a primary advantage of betting -- that
everyone is going to fold and give you
the pot right then. Obviously, this is
what you want when you're bluffing.
Here's
a memorable tournament hand of mine. Blinds
are 100-200, from late position I raise
to 1000 in hopes of stealing, and surprisingly
I get called by both blinds. I've got
a suited ace of spades. Flop comes garbage,
with one spade. The small blind bets the
minimum, 200, and the big blind calls.
For a negligible 200 chips, I can take
another card in a pot of 3400, so why
not call?
The
turn was another spade, giving me a nut
four-flush. SB bets 400, and EP calls.
Now I'm getting spectacular pot odds,
10.5 to 1, to draw to a nut flush. I call
and the river brings spade #5, which unfortunately
for SB also made him two pair. He makes
a big bet, I set him in and take his stack.
He curses my luck and asks how I could
be so foolish as to chase a runner-runner
flush. Luck had nothing to do with it,
and he was the fool, not I. If he'd bet
so much as 1000 on the flop, I wouldn't
have been around to make my flush.
If
you're going to be a good bluffer, you've
got to muster up the courage to make a
formidable bet when you don't have a hand.
Because I'm not going to let you have
a 1500-chip pot for a minimum bet of 100.
If I've got two cards, I'm going to call
such a bet. Or play back at you with nothing.
(Note
that some players make tiny bets when
they've got a monster, so don't assume
that this bet implies weakness. As with
all things in poker, consider who you're
playing against.)
8.
Don't make ridiculously huge bets. I'm
sure you've all seen this: the blinds
are 15-30, a couple people limp, and somebody
goes all in for 1500.
Yes,
he's probably going to steal the pot.
But at what cost? He's risking 1500 chips
to win 100 or so. It's a bad play for
several reasons.
First
of all, a raise to 300 would probably
achieve the same effect. The extra 1200
chips you invested did you no additional
good.
Second,
when you risk that much to win that little,
the odds start working against you. The
pot is giving you 1 to 15 odds (not 15
to 1). You'd have to win 15 out of 16
pots for this to be a break-even play.
You don't have to run into aces or outdraws
that often for this play to hurt you.
Third,
such situations arise early on in tournaments.
See point #4 above; you're going to be
called more liberally. Especially in a
very cheap or free tournament, where some
players are ecstatic to double-up or go
home early.
9.
Don't forget to bet when you do have something.
Now, some folks will bet aggressively
when they don't have a hand, and steal
effectively. But when they do have a hand,
they want to get cute. They limp with
big hands, make small bets, check-raise
the flop, and so on.
This
approach has some problems. First, this
reveals the true strength of their current
hand. Second, it makes me more skeptical
of the betting they do at other times.
Third, they risk being outdrawn, because
big hands play better against fewer opponents
and calling doesn't thin the field. Fourth,
when you pass up opportunities to raise
and bet with your big hands, I can get
away cheap if I'm beaten.
I
never slowplay, unless I flop such a monster
that I don't mind giving free cards. If
I flop a strong hand, I'm going to bet
it, with the same type of bet I would
make with a complete bluff. You won't
know if I have a hand, or if I'm making
my usual stab at a stealable pot.
Yes,
everyone might fold. But that's okay.
Some people try to parlay every halfway
decent flop into a massive pot, risking
ruin in the process. I'm perfectly content
to pick up another little pot with 0%
chance of being outdrawn. And I DON'T
reveal my hand. Ever. Let 'em wonder.
And
if you do get called down, terrific. The
table gets to watch you show down the
nuts, and you take somebody's stack in
the process. You play aggressively all
the time and only show down big hands
when called, and no one will want to get
involved with you. You'll start winning
pots just because you're in them.
Sometimes I can actually feel momentum
building. When I do I start playing even
more aggressively, stealing more pots.
Maybe this is what Doyle Brunson means
when he talks about rushes.
10.
Use chips effectively. This is more about
betting in general and not just bluffing,
but it bears mention.
Earlier,
we discussed the foolishness of raising
1500 chips into a pot of 100 chips. A
raise of 300 would have done just as well;
the extra 1200 chips did very little.
Similarly,
a lot of players misuse their stacks.
They do not get maximum value for the
chips they have.
Classic
example: Pot is 2000. EP, with a stack
of 2800, bets 2000. LP, with a stack of
10000, calls.
EP
is now committed to a pot of 6000, with
only 800 chips left. He can't bluff --
such a small bet will be called. He can't
check, because his opponent is going to
set him in on the turn. The extra 800
chips did him no good.
Better to move in for 2800 on the flop.
The extra 800 might be enough induce a
fold. Furthermore, it charges the opponent
more money to see the cards. If you bet
2000 on the flop and 800 on the turn,
LP gets to see four cards for 2800. If
you bet 2800 on the flop, LP gets to see
only the flop for 2800. If you bet all
at once, you're charging the same price
and giving your opponent less information.
I'm
not going to bet or call for more than
a third of my stack. If it's that much,
I'm going to get all-in or fold. Yes,
I may be overbetting the pot a little,
for example the pot is 1000 and I move
in for 2200. But getting full value for
my chips is the greater concern. The overbet
might be enough to win me the pot right
there. I might get called, but that's
the risk you take. Calling the flop for
1000 leaves me with too few chips to do
anything after that, and I'm pot-committed
anyway.
(Exception:
it's a limit or pot-limit tournament,
I'm very close to the money or moving
up, and calling the flop might leave me
some chips so I can outlast another small
stack if the flop isn't good to me.)
11.
Don't be afraid to back off. Some of your
bluffs are going to get called. Depending
on the situation and opponent, you might
want to back off and let them have it.
Don't try to ramrod everything through,
especially if you've been called by a
predictable player. If you think your
opponent might be drawing, or can be bullied
on the turn, you might risk firing a second
round. But any good poker pro will tell
you that "when to fire that second round"
is one of the toughest things to learn.
But
don't be afraid to give up. It's okay
to lose sometimes. If you've stolen enough
pots, you can afford for one or two of
your bluff attempts to fail. You don't
have to be right 100% of the time. You
won't lose your edge if you get played-back
at once or twice. (I always take time
and think before I fold, even if there's
no way I'm going to call. Let 'em think
I made a big laydown.)
Similarly,
you don't have to play EVERY hand. Pick
your spots. Besides, you want to make
these plays in favorable situations. Not
all the time.
12.
Understand and use position. Brunson says
in Super System that if he could have
position all night, he'd win without ever
looking at his cards. Imagine that for
a second -- favorable position renders
the cards irrelevant!
You
don't have to go to that extreme, but
it is important to understand the value
of position. Play tight up front and looser
in the back, especially pre-flop. Take
advantage of acting last.
At
the same time, exploit preconceptions
about position that others have. Don't
be afraid to bet off the button or even
UTG if you think the flop missed everyone.
It's riskier, yes, but your bet will get
more respect because of where it came
from.
There
is a concept called "right of first bluff",
meaning whoever breathes on the pot first
will win it. Sometimes it can be to your
advantage to act first.
13. Don't limp first-in. Limping gives
you no chance of winning the pot right
then. Raising will often steal you the
antes. If I'm not comfortable raising
first-in with a hand, I don't play it
at all. (Exception: early in the event,
I'll limp if I think I can see a cheap
flop with a hand that can flop big.)
14.
Pay attention to online tells. Yes, they
exist, and at a key point in a tournament
often become very obvious.
As an aside, this point was the most controversial
when I first mentioned it in the forums.
An equally lengthy article could be written
on this subject alone.
But,
sometimes people do give things away.
My favorite: the guy who takes way too
long to make a simple decision. Nobody
spends their time bank thinking about
whether or not to bet a good hand (well,
not at my stake level anyway). Another
pearl of poker wisdom I've found to be
true: "anyone who's thinking, is thinking
about folding." Anyone who takes too long
to think on a non-threatening flop can
likely be re-raised out of the hand.
Also,
look for people who bet less, not more,
on the turn and river. As another poster
said, "you can just feel their asshole
tightening up."
15.
Put some thought into how much you bet.
Ultimate Bet has these "bet pot", "bet
minimum", and "all in" buttons. They're
the only amounts anyone ever bets. Not
me. I take the time to enter the bet amount
I think will apply maximum pressure on
my opponents, and make most effective
use of my chips. You should too.
Another
advantage to doing this is that it gives
you plausibility when you take extra time
to complete an action. It takes time to
type numbers, you know.
By
the way, when I'm setting someone all-in,
I like to the exact amount of chips they
have left. I could just go all-in myself
and get the excess back, but I think making
my opponent see the exact number has some
intimidation value.
16.
And finally, Get the courage to bluff
irrelevant of your own hand. Profitable
bluff situations are dictated by external
factors -- who's in the hand, their stack
size, the pot size, and what flopped.
Most
bad players can't free themselves from
thinking in terms of "what hand can I
make?" They're focusing only on their
own hand, which leads to problems like
#6 above.
They
might semi-bluff, but if the flop misses
them entirely they don't have the courage
to make a pure bluff. This costs them
a great many profitable steal situations.
I've come to view bluffing as a sort of
proposition bet. When I bluff, I'm wagering
that you're going to fold, based on table
conditions. The issue is YOUR hand, not
mine. What I hold is largely irrelevant.
You
can even calculate exact pot odds for
your bluffs. Let's say the blinds are
100-200, and you're going to raise to
600 to try and win the pot now. You're
risking 600 to win 300, meaning that you
have to successfully steal two-thirds
of the time to break even. But you don't
even have to do that well, because sometimes
you'll win the pot when you are called,
either by bluffing again later or by flopping
a good hand.
And
here we see the Gap yet again. I can bet
with a weaker hand than my opponent needs
to call. I can bet with garbage, but you
can't call or raise unless you've got
a strong hand, or the courage to re-raise
me with no hand. And 99% of the people
you'll face in small online tournaments
don't have that.
Before
I applied these principles to my game,
I finished in the money in 2 out of 33
multi-table tourneys this year. Since
then, I'm cashing about 25% of the time,
and making the final table about 10%.
And all it really took was learning how
to steal pots.
I
don't find myself getting anted to death,
because stealing pots keeps my stack size
up. I don't bust out on bad beats as much,
because I pick my spots better and acquire
enough chips to survive a loss or two.
I don't find myself not getting hands,
because I'm learning how to win without
a hand.
©
The Poker Forum.com, all rights reserved
|